Crater Lake Mazda
2517 Biddle Rd
Medford, OR 97504
541-625-1704

Compare the2023 Mazda 3VS 2022 Volvo V60 Cross Country

2023 Mazda 3
2022 Volvo V60 Cross Country

Safety

The Mazda 3 has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags helps prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The V60 Cross Country doesn’t offer a front passenger side knee airbag.

Both the Mazda 3 and the V60 Cross Country have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors and rear cross-path warning.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda 3 is safer than the Volvo V60 Cross Country:

Mazda 3

V60 Cross Country

OVERALL STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

89

192

Neck Injury Risk

17%

25.7%

Neck Compression

27 lbs.

63 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

205/212 lbs.

395/518 lbs.

Passenger

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

153

314

Chest Compression

.4 inches

.7 inches

Neck Injury Risk

30%

30%

Neck Compression

20 lbs.

114 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

178/201 lbs.

360/533 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda 3 is safer than the Volvo V60 Cross Country:

Mazda 3

V60 Cross Country

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Max Damage Depth

10 inches

13 inches

HIC

199

319

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Warranty

Mazda’s powertrain warranty covers the 3 1 year and 10,000 miles longer than Volvo covers the V60 Cross Country. Any repair needed on the engine, transmission, axles, joints or driveshafts is fully covered for 5 years or 60,000 miles. Coverage on the V60 Cross Country ends after only 4 years or 50,000 miles.

There are almost 2 times as many Mazda dealers as there are Volvo dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the 3’s warranty.

Reliability

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are better in initial quality than Volvo vehicles. With 76 fewer problems per 100 vehicles, JD Power ranks Mazda higher than Volvo.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Volvo vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mazda above average in long-term dependability. With 13 more problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, Volvo is rated below average.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2021 Auto Issue reports that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Volvo vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Mazda first in overall reliability. Volvo is ranked 18th.

Engine

The Mazda 3’s optional 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder produces 62 lbs.-ft. more torque (320 vs. 258) than the V60 Cross Country’s 2.0 turbo 4-cylinder.

As tested in Motor Trend the Mazda 3 4 cyl. is faster than the Volvo V60 Cross Country (automatics tested):

3

V60 Cross Country

Zero to 60 MPH

7.3 sec

8 sec

Quarter Mile

15.7 sec

16.1 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

90.3 MPH

86.4 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Mazda 3 (except Turbo)’s fuel efficiency. The V60 Cross Country doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Both the Mazda 3 and the V60 Cross Country offer an available automatic start/stop engine feature to stop unnecessary fuel waste and pollution at stoplights and heavy traffic. All Mazda 3s with automatic start/stop have a standard disable switch for the system, so a driver can keep the engine from shutting off when the vehicle stops temporarily. A disable switch costs extra on the V60 Cross Country.

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Mazda 3 uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended with the 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder engine for maximum performance). The V60 Cross Country requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

Environmental Friendliness

In its Green Vehicle Guide, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rates the Mazda 3 higher (7 out of 10) than the Volvo V60 Cross Country (5). This means the Mazda 3 produces up to 8 pounds less smog-producing pollutants than the V60 Cross Country every 15,000 miles.

Transmission

The Mazda 3 offers a manual transmission for better acceleration, control and sportiness. The V60 Cross Country doesn’t offer a manual transmission.

Brakes and Stopping

The Mazda 3 stops much shorter than the V60 Cross Country:

Mazda 3

V60 Cross Country

60 to 0 MPH

115 feet

132 feet

Motor Trend

Suspension and Handling

The front and rear suspension of the Mazda 3 uses coil springs for better ride, handling and control than the V60 Cross Country, which uses transverse leafs springs in the rear. Coil springs compress more progressively and offer more suspension travel for a smoother ride with less bottoming out.

The Mazda 3 Premium Sedan handles at .86 G’s, while the V60 Cross Country pulls only .82 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

For better maneuverability, the Mazda 3’s turning circle is 2.3 feet tighter than the V60 Cross Country’s (34.8 feet vs. 37.1 feet).

Chassis

The Mazda 3 may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 650 to 950 pounds less than the Volvo V60 Cross Country.

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is 1 foot shorter than the V60 Cross Country, making the Mazda 3 easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Ergonomics

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Mazda 3 has standard extendable sun visors. The V60 Cross Country doesn’t offer extendable visors.

Model Availability

The Mazda 3 comes in sedan and four door hatchback bodystyles; the Volvo V60 Cross Country isn’t available as a sedan or four door hatchback.

The Mazda 3 is available in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The V60 Cross Country doesn’t offer a two-wheel drive configuration.

Recommendations

The Mazda 3 has won recognition from these important consumer publications:

Mazda 3

V60 Cross Country

Consumer Reports® Recommends

TRUE

n/a

Car Book “Best Bet”

TRUE

n/a

The Mazda 3 outsold the Volvo 60 Series by almost three to one during the 2021 model year.

Crater Lake Mazda | 2517 Biddle Rd Medford, OR 97504 | 541-625-1704

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia