Crater Lake Mazda
2517 Biddle Rd
Medford, OR 97504
541-625-1704

Compare the2025 Mazda CX-90VS 2025 Lincoln Aviator

2025 Mazda CX-90
2025 Lincoln Aviator

Safety

With its standard Smart Brake Support, the Mazda CX-90 is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Lincoln Aviator, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:

CX-90

Aviator

Overall Evaluation

GOOD

MARGINAL

Crossing Child - DAY

12 MPH

AVOIDED

AVOIDED

25 MPH

-23 MPH

-21 MPH

Crossing Adult - NIGHT

12 MPH Brights

AVOIDED

AVOIDED

12 MPH Low beams

AVOIDED

-9 MPH

25 MPH Brights

AVOIDED

-20 MPH

25 MPH Low beams

AVOIDED

-9 MPH

Parallel Adult - NIGHT

25 MPH Brights

AVOIDED

-18 MPH

25 MPH Low beams

AVOIDED

-4 MPH

37 MPH Brights

-33 MPH

-15 MPH

Warning Issued-Brights

2.4 sec

1.4 sec

37 MPH Low beams

-26 MPH

No Slowing

Warning Issued-Low beams

1.5 sec

.4 sec

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-90. But it costs extra on the Aviator.

Both the CX-90 and the Aviator have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-90 is safer than the Lincoln Aviator:

CX-90

Aviator

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Spine Acceleration

31 G’s

39 G’s

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The Mazda CX-90 has achieved the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) highest rating of “Top Safety Pick Plus” for the 2025 model year. This distinction is based on its exceptional performance in IIHS’ rigorous battery of safety tests. Specifically, it earned a “Good” rating in the latest, more stringent moderate overlap front crash test, a “Good” result in the updated side impact test, and a “Good” score in the revised pedestrian crash prevention test. The Aviator is not even a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2025.

Warranty

There are over 13 percent more Mazda dealers than there are Lincoln dealers, which makes it easier should you ever need service under the CX-90’s warranty.

Reliability

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2024 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Lincoln vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mazda above average in long-term dependability. With 5 more problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, Lincoln is rated below average.

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the CX-90 running on electricity gets better mileage than the Aviator:

MPGe

CX-90

AWD

PHEV Electric Motor

53 city/61 hwy

Aviator

MPG

RWD

3.0 turbo V6

18 city/25 hwy

AWD

3.0 turbo V6

17 city/25 hwy

On the EPA test cycle the CX-90 running its gasoline engine gets better mileage than the Aviator:

MPG

CX-90

AWD

3.3 turbo 6-cyl. Hybrid

24 city/28 hwy

Turbo S 3.3 turbo 6-cyl. Hybrid

23 city/28 hwy

2.5 4-cyl. Hybrid

24 city/27 hwy

Aviator

RWD

3.0 turbo V6

18 city/25 hwy

AWD

3.0 turbo V6

17 city/25 hwy

The CX-90 PHEV can travel with zero emissions for 26 miles. The Aviator can’t move without running its internal combustion engine.

Regenerative brakes improve the CX-90’s fuel efficiency by converting inertia back into energy instead of wasting it. The Aviator doesn’t offer a regenerative braking system.

The CX-90 has a standard locking fuel door and a locking charge port which lock and unlock with the power locks. The Aviator doesn’t offer a locking fuel filler door. A locking fuel door helps prevent fuel theft and vandalism, such as sugar in the tank and a locking charge port prevents tampering and damage.

Brakes and Stopping

The CX-90 stops much shorter than the Aviator:

CX-90

Aviator

60 to 0 MPH

114 feet

124 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels

For better traction, the CX-90 has larger standard tires than the Aviator (265/55R19 vs. 255/55R20).

Suspension and Handling

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the CX-90’s wheelbase is 3.7 inches longer than on the Aviator (122.8 inches vs. 119.1 inches).

The CX-90 Premium Plus handles at .82 G’s, while the Aviator AWD pulls only .80 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

For better maneuverability, the CX-90’s turning circle is 1.1 feet tighter than the Aviator’s (38.1 feet vs. 39.2 feet).

Passenger Space

The CX-90 offers optional seating for 8 passengers; the Aviator can only carry up to 7.

The CX-90 has .4 inches more rear legroom and 1.2 inches more third row legroom than the Aviator.

Cargo Capacity

To make loading groceries and cargo easier when your hands are full, the CX-90 Premium’s liftgate can be opened and closed just by kicking your foot under the back bumper, leaving your hands completely free. The Aviator doesn’t offer a hands-free gesture to open its liftgate, forcing you to put cargo down if your hands are full.

Ergonomics

When the CX-90 Turbo S is put in reverse, both rearview mirrors tilt from their original position. This gives the driver a better view of the curb during parallel parking maneuvers. Shifting out of reverse puts the mirrors into their original positions. The Aviator’s mirrors don’t automatically adjust for backing.

Recommendations

The Mazda CX-90 outsold the Lincoln Aviator by over two to one during 2024.

Crater Lake Mazda | 2517 Biddle Rd Medford, OR 97504 | 541-625-1704

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia