To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-70. But it costs extra on the RX.
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the CX-70’s standard Hill Descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The RX doesn’t offer Hill Descent Control.
Both the CX-70 and the RX have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda CX-70 is safer than the Lexus RX:
|
CX-70 |
RX |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
116 |
165 |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
324/335 lbs. |
353/469 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
255 |
472 |
Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Stress |
96 lbs. |
160 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
83 lbs. |
114 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
253/344 lbs. |
454/389 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the CX-70 is much safer than the RX:
|
CX-70 |
RX |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
POOR |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Injury Chance |
16% |
25% |
Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Leg Forces L/R |
270/270 pounds |
382/472 pounds |
Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Chest Rating |
GOOD |
POOR |
Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Restraints |
GOOD |
POOR |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-70 is safer than the Lexus RX:
|
CX-70 |
RX |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
53 |
58 |
Hip Force |
174 lbs. |
206 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
21 |
63 |
Spine Acceleration |
27 G’s |
43 G’s |
Hip Force |
416 lbs. |
640 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
15 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
31 G’s |
47 G’s |
Hip Force |
439 lbs. |
919 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the CX-70 is 1.4% to 2.8% less likely to roll over than the RX.
The Mazda CX-70 has achieved the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) highest rating of “Top Safety Pick Plus” for the 2025 model year. This distinction is based on its exceptional performance in IIHS’ rigorous battery of safety tests. Specifically, it earned a “Good” rating in the latest, more stringent moderate overlap front crash test, a “Good” result in the updated side impact test, and a “Good” score in the revised pedestrian crash prevention test. The RX is not even a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2025.